🇪🇺 Automated Compliance with the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA)

The Wake Up Call One Year After DORA Enforcement
The first year of the Digital Operational Resilience Act, Regulation 2022/2554, has delivered a clear message across Europe. Many financial institutions were operationally confident, yet few could demonstrate the traceability, ICT visibility, and continuous evidence that DORA expects under Articles 8, 10, and 11. Early supervisory reviews and readiness assessments during 2025 have consistently highlighted gaps in ICT asset inventories, critical dependencies, software supply chains, and contract intelligence. Licenseware eliminates these weaknesses by producing verifiable DORA-compliant evidence within days, at a fraction of the time and cost of manual programmes, and with full coverage across EU and UK regulatory environments.
⏰ DORA’s deadline has passed, and it is now a permanent operational requirement for EU and UK-based companies.
One year into supervision, the expectation has evolved. Regulators now focus less on whether firms have begun their programmes and more on whether they can produce evidence on demand. Continuous monitoring is no longer an aspiration; it is a necessity.
Why So Many Firms Fall Short in 2025
Organisations can easily underestimate the volume of evidence required under DORA and the speed at which supervisors expect it to be produced. The following weaknesses appeared repeatedly across European supervisory interactions:
⚠️ Asset inventories that were incomplete or outdated
⚠️ Critical function mappings that did not trace dependencies to technology components
⚠️ Inconsistent categorisation of software and third-party services
⚠️ Contract clause obligations that were not interpreted correctly
⚠️ Fragmented reporting that required manual consolidation
⚠️ Limited ability to demonstrate ICT visibility at a moment’s notice
⚠️ Traditional methods cannot support continuous evidence.
⚠️ Manual reconciliation collapses under scale.
⚠️ Spreadsheet-based inventories fall out of sync within hours almost immediately.
⚠️ Contract reviews become bottlenecks rather than governance controls.
⚠️ Dependency mapping becomes static and unusable for real operational risk scenarios.
This has simulataneously created a new set of organisational risks:
🔴 Regulatory risk.
🔴 Operational risk.
🔴 Reputational risk.
Board-level accountability is now activated.
The Cost of Not Being Compliant
The financial sector is already seeing these consequences. The institutions that have succeeded in 2025 are those that embraced operational visibility early and transformed their governance model.
The cost profile includes:
- supervisory findings that trigger mandatory remediation
- increased insurance premiums due to elevated operational risk
- potential administrative penalties by national competent authorities
- disruptions that exceed seven million euros per major ICT incident
- loss of customer trust when operational failures become public
- increased board scrutiny and personal accountability for senior management
Using Licenseware for DORA Evidence Collection
Licenseware provides the fastest path from fragmented ICT data to verifiable regulatory evidence, and it does so without requiring major transformation programmes. The platform enables organisations to achieve more than ninety-five % ICT visibility within days by combining their existing discovery sources, CMDBs and procurement data through APIs or static uploads.
From this point, Licenseware automates governance processes that map directly to DORA expectations:
📀 Golden Record Accuracy
Using the Software Inventory Manager app in Licenseware you can produce a single verified inventory that consolidates data from all discovery tools and procurement systems. This supports Article 8 and Article 11 requirements for ICT asset visibility and traceability.
🤖 AI-Driven Governance and Clause Interpretation
NEO Insights and NEO Context interpret contract clauses, identify operational obligations, classify vendor risk and contractual risk and highlight third-party dependencies that affect critical functions. This supports Article 10 and Articles 28 to 30.
🔁 Continuous Evidence Generation
Licenseware creates automated evidence cycles that update within twenty-four hours. These cycles ensure the organisation always has an up-to-date trail of ICT risks, assets, dependencies and contract positions. This supports Article 11 and continuous monitoring expectations.
☑️ Operational Governance at Scale
Licenseware becomes an operating model. It replaces manual reporting with real-time insight and supports strategic efficiency improvements across IT, procurement and risk management.
This is why the platform is now used as a foundation for DORA readiness programmes, supervisory reviews and operational resilience initiatives across the EU and UK.
DORA Outcomes and Time to Value
🔍 Visibility and Data Integrity
| App | Articles | Outcome | Key Dependency | Time to Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software Inventory Manager | 8, 11 | ICT inventory and coverage | CMDB or discovery sources | ✓ Day 1 |
| Golden Record Generator | 8 | Golden Record creation | Multiple data exports | ✓ Instant (less than 1 day) |
| Infrastructure Mapper | 8, 24 | Dependency and topology mapping | Optional observability tools | ✓ Day 1 |
🔦 Governance and Oversight
| App | Articles | Outcome | Key Dependency | Time to Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| License and Contracts Manager | 28 to 30 | Contract and clause register | Legal validation | ✓ Within Week 1 |
| NEO Insights and NEO Context | 10, 11 | AI governance and clause intelligence | SIM and LCM data | ✓ Less than 1 day |
| Self Assessment Service: ITAM Maturity Assessment | 5, 13 | Governance scoring and roadmap | Policy and process inputs | ✓ 2 to 4 hours |
Each module directly maps to DORA outcomes and provides measurable progress within days. This is why many organisations now use Licenseware to produce evidence during supervisory reviews.
Data Collection and Collector Flexibility
Licenseware integrates with more than eighty discovery tools, including Lansweeper (our personal favorite), Microsoft System Center, BigFix, Intune, Tanium and CrowdStrike. The platform accepts static files, APIs and custom connectors for any additional source.
Organisations can Licenseware Collector with its software usage metering for secure, as a complementary low-impact telemetry across devices. There is no requirement to deploy agents across the estate.
These ensure full visibility regardless of the organisation’s current tooling landscape.
In environments with mixed data quality, the Golden Record Generator app validates and reconciles every dataset before any metric is published. This removes the largest obstacle to DORA compliance: data confidence.
Peace of Mind Metrics for Continuous Improvement
Licenseware proposes metrics that establish internal accountability for DORA evidence and governance quality.
| Metric | Description | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility Coverage | Percentage of ICT assets reconciled into the Golden Record | 95% or more |
| Evidence Latency | Average time for an ICT or contract change to appear in governance dashboards | 24 hours or less |
| Audit Readiness Index | Weighted balance of visibility, contract linkage and governance maturity | 90% or more |
Example:
Visibility 98%, Contract Linkage 90%, and Maturity 88% result in a score of 92%, which is considered fully audit-ready.
Why Organisations Choose Licenseware
In 2025 the cost of manual DORA compliance can exceed one million euros for large institutions. Operational disruptions cost many times more. For a fraction of the cost, Licenseware provides a faster, more scalable and more accurate path to DORA alignment, continuous evidence and operational governance.
The result is not only regulatory compliance.
✅ It is operational confidence.
✅ It is board-level assurance.
✅ It is resilience you can prove.
High Level 100 Day Roadmap to DORA Compliance
| Time | Action | Stakeholders | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Day 1 | Connect discovery and procurement data | IT Ops, Data Owner, CISO | Establish Golden Record |
| Day 2 to 3 | Visualise dependencies and reconcile contracts | Procurement, Legal | Centralise dependencies and contract register |
| Week 1 | Enable governance dashboards | Compliance, IT Ops | Enable live governance |
| Week 2 to 3 | Complete Maturity Assessment | CISO, CFO | Deliver governance roadmap |
| Month 1 | Integrate evidence flows with GRC or SOC | Security Operations, GRC | Initiate Continuous Evidence Cycle |
| Month 2 | Review Peace of Mind Metrics | CIO, Internal Audit | Confirm resilience status |
| Day 100 | Present verified DORA dashboard | Executives or Regulator | Present evidence pack |
Ready to move from DORA risk to Board assurance in 100 days?
👉 Request a 30-minute DORA Readiness Diagnostic Today
📚 Further Reading and Supervisory References
| Category | Source | Link |
|---|---|---|
| European Supervisory Authorities | EBA. Report on the Digital Operational Resilience of the EU Financial Sector, 2024 | https://www.eba.europa.eu/publications-and-media |
| European Supervisory Authorities | EBA. ICT and Security Risk Management Guidelines | https://www.eba.europa.eu/regulation-and-policy/internal-governance/guidelines-ict-and-security-risk-management |
| European Supervisory Authorities | EBA. DORA Implementation Timeline and Readiness Assessment, 2024 | https://www.eba.europa.eu/dora |
| European Supervisory Authorities | ESMA. Trends, Risks and Vulnerabilities Report, 2024 | https://www.esma.europa.eu/document/trv-report |
| European Supervisory Authorities | EIOPA. Opinion on ICT and Security Risk Management, 2024 | https://www.eiopa.europa.eu/document-library/opinion |
| European Supervisory Authorities | Joint ESAs Committee. Final Draft Regulatory Technical Standards for DORA, 2024 and 2025 | https://www.esrb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/esas-dora-technical-standards |
| National Competent Authorities | DNB. Supervisory Strategy and Priorities for 2025 | https://www.dnb.nl/en/publications |
| National Competent Authorities | BaFin. Supervisory Priorities 2025 | https://www.bafin.de/EN/Publications |
| National Competent Authorities | Central Bank of Ireland. Cross Industry Guidance on Operational Resilience | https://www.centralbank.ie/regulation |
| National Competent Authorities | CSSF. Supervisory Priorities 2025 | https://www.cssf.lu/en/publications |
| National Competent Authorities | Banco de España. Supervisory Priorities 2025 | https://www.bde.es/bde/en/areas/supervision |
| National Competent Authorities | ACPR. Operational Resilience Review | https://acpr.banque-france.fr/publications |
| National Competent Authorities | FIN-FSA. Supervisory Priorities 2025 | https://www.finanssivalvonta.fi/en/publications-and-registers |
| Industry | European Banking Federation. DORA Implementation Survey, 2024 | https://www.ebf.eu/publications |
| Industry | EACB. DORA Readiness Reflections, 2024 | https://www.eacb.coop/en/news |
| Industry | ESBG. DORA Implementation Insights, 2024 | https://www.wsbi-esbg.org/publications |