API Wars

As technology evolves, software copyright laws become fuzzy and open to interpretation. This year we’ll see the Supreme Court review the legal status of a copyright dispute related to Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) between Oracle and Google. Previously the ruling was in favour of Oracle, who accused Google of infringing the copyright of the Java API, for its reimplementation in the Android OS.

An API is “a set of functions and procedures allowing the creation of applications that access the features or data of an operating system, application, or other service”. In other words, APIs are about creating interaction and connecting things that were not previously connected. Successful APIs foster fruitful communities which bring the underlying technology one step further, by creating useful derived works or by (re)implementing it in novel ways. Most software companies try to make their products more open and easy to integrate and use with other products. This usually increases the adoption rate, the overall popularity, and appreciation for the product. This type of openness is meant to build bridges between companies and encourage partnerships.

At the end of the day, we all want to make money. Whereas some are in the business of building bridges others seem to profit more by building walls. The world is divided like that. Being all alone and surrounded by high walls can make you vulnerable to scrutiny. As a consequence of their own actions, Oracle is now accused of copying Amazon’s S3 API. Of course, different shades of grey come to light when you find yourself accused of a crime you previously reported. Oracle has argued that using an API is not related to reimplementation disqualifying it as an infringement of copyright.

API copyright wars could create a legal minefield of gotchas. This generates confusion and spreads fear amongst consumers. Sure, you should always ask for permission to use an API, but giving companies monopoly power over the competition by means of copyright law defies the purpose of the law itself. Let us not forget that these laws are made to protect the creator from abuse and not to empower the creator to abuse.

Posted in ,

Licenseware

W22-23 SAM & ITAM Jobs

By Alex Cojocaru | June 1, 2023 | Comments Off on W22-23 SAM & ITAM Jobs

W21-23 SAM & ITAM Jobs

By Alex Cojocaru | May 26, 2023 | Comments Off on W21-23 SAM & ITAM Jobs

W20-23 SAM & ITAM Jobs

By Licenseware | May 19, 2023 | Comments Off on W20-23 SAM & ITAM Jobs

Redefining Software Asset Management: A Shift Towards Agile and Modular Tooling

By Licenseware | May 15, 2023 | Comments Off on Redefining Software Asset Management: A Shift Towards Agile and Modular Tooling

Licenseware Achieves SOC 2 Type 1 Certification: A Milestone in Security Excellence

By Licenseware | May 15, 2023 |

W19-23 SAM & ITAM Jobs

By Licenseware | May 12, 2023 | Comments Off on W19-23 SAM & ITAM Jobs

W18-23 SAM & ITAM Jobs

By Licenseware | May 5, 2023 | Comments Off on W18-23 SAM & ITAM Jobs

W17-23 SAM & ITAM Jobs

By Licenseware | April 28, 2023 | Comments Off on W17-23 SAM & ITAM Jobs

Discover the Benefits of Licenseware at the Oracle5: Live Event

By Licenseware | April 27, 2023 | Comments Off on Discover the Benefits of Licenseware at the Oracle5: Live Event

Oracle CloudWorld Tour London – A Memorable and Rewarding Experience 🎉

By Licenseware | April 21, 2023 | Comments Off on Oracle CloudWorld Tour London – A Memorable and Rewarding Experience 🎉